The US government ordered Anthropic to withdraw Fable 5 and Mythos 5, citing national security concerns after Amazon researchers reportedly found a method to bypass Fable 5's safety guardrails. Cybersecurity researchers fired back with an open letter calling the move dangerous, while Anthropic noted the same jailbreaks exist across other AI models. The controversy raises the question of whether the government's intervention is inadvertently amplifying Anthropic's public profile.
The Trump administration is moving to block an NAACP lawsuit alleging that xAI operates gas turbines without required air quality permits to power its Grok data center. The government's intervention argues that the U.S. military's reliance on Grok for wartime operations constitutes a national security interest. The case sets up a significant legal test over whether AI infrastructure tied to defense claims can sidestep Clean Air Act enforcement.
The U.S. Department of Justice has intervened in the regulatory dispute over xAI's unpermitted natural gas turbines, framing continued operation as essential to national, economic, and energy security. The DOJ's position centers on the Pentagon's dependence on xAI's computing infrastructure. This marks a significant federal escalation that could shield the AI company from local environmental enforcement.
The White House imposed export controls on Anthropic's Mythos AI model, citing national security concerns including potential access by Chinese entities and jailbreak vulnerabilities. Authorities required access be limited to U.S. citizens only. Rather than implement user-level restrictions, Anthropic chose to remove Mythos from availability altogether, marking a significant precedent for government-directed AI model withdrawal.
The White House imposed export restrictions on Anthropic's Mythos AI system after intelligence suggested a China-linked group may have already accessed it. According to Semafor, national security fears — specifically the risk of Chinese access to Mythos 5 or Fable 5 — were a key driver of the policy action. If confirmed, such access would represent a serious national security threat at the frontier of AI capability.
Major AI rivals including leaders from Anthropic, OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta, and Google DeepMind signed an open letter urging US lawmakers to close a biosecurity gap. They want companies selling synthetic DNA and RNA to screen orders for sequences that could help create dangerous pathogens. The concern is that more capable AI tools and cheaper biology infrastructure could lower barriers to misuse.
Ars Technica reports that Trump’s administration is considering government safety tests for advanced AI models before deployment. Critics argue the plan may be short-sighted and performative because DOGE cuts have weakened the US teams best positioned to conduct serious AI security reviews. The concern is that testing without staffing, transparency, and enforcement may not prevent dangerous deployments.
INSIDE examines how China’s Amap has become controversial in Taiwan beyond ordinary mapping or navigation use. The article says its service relies on user data and AI-based inference rather than full official data integrations. That model could send movement traces and behavioral signals back to China, creating risks for hybrid warfare intelligence, influence operations, and Taiwan’s broader governance of map data and digital infrastructure.
The White House and Congress are alarmed that US intelligence agencies are lagging in deploying classified AI tools due to a severe compute shortage. To address this, a $9 billion funding package has been allocated for the CIA and NSA. This capital aims to secure advanced chips and build the infrastructure needed to run next-generation AI models.
In this column published in Interconnects, author Nathan Lambert cites the latest observations from policy expert Dean Ball on the high-profile "Anthropic v…